• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
RTE3 Use real time ethernet as "normal" ethernet interface
#44
Well I tried the very same thing


Code:
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=4.48 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2.34 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.68 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1002 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1.49 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1.78 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.78 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1.04 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=2.13 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1.46 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=2.21 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=2.19 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=1.78 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=1.45 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1.82 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=1.40 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=1.84 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=1.64 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=2.26 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=1.97 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=2.97 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=1.95 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=2.49 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=1.41 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=1.35 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=1.71 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=2.88 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=1.46 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=1.76 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=1.48 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=2.10 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=1.90 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=2.26 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=2.12 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=1.73 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=1.66 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=37 ttl=64 time=2.31 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=38 ttl=64 time=1.85 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=39 ttl=64 time=2.39 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=40 ttl=64 time=2.37 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=41 ttl=64 time=1.93 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=42 ttl=64 time=1.96 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=43 ttl=64 time=2.10 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.30.253: icmp_seq=44 ttl=64 time=1.56 ms


but here as you can see every ping works.

Is there additional traffic running across this specific IP address or is it just the ping command as only message? What else are you running on your netPI? Other containers that could occupy the CPU a lot? What is the general traffice running over this network the cifx0 interface is connected to?

What is true is that the Ethernet LAN interface across netX chip (which was initially made for supporting industrial networks) is 10 times slower in communication and throughput than the standard eth0 interface. We have to pack all TCP/IP traffic into acyclic messages between Raspberry CPU and netX and as you know this interface is an SPI connection at 25Mhz clock rate only. But I doubt this is a root cause for loosing IP packets.
You never fail until you stop trying.“, Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)

  Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: RTE3 Use real time ethernet as "normal" ethernet interface - by Armin@netPI - May-6th-2019, 04:26 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  activate Ethernet cifx0 Christian_Rau 3 2,620 March-26th-2021, 05:28 AM
Last Post: Armin@netPI
  Web browser reports "insecure connection" when accessing netPI for the first time Armin@netPI 2 2,838 January-31st-2020, 07:07 AM
Last Post: Armin@netPI
  Profinet Startup Time Schranz 3 3,512 November-18th-2019, 03:22 PM
Last Post: Armin@netPI
  normal ethernet port using for Profinet MGharat 4 4,759 August-7th-2019, 10:39 AM
Last Post: hannes
  Launching multi-containers at a time - Docker stacks Armin@netPI 0 1,906 June-4th-2019, 04:11 PM
Last Post: Armin@netPI
  niot-e-npi3-51-en (RS485 <-> Industrial Ethernet) merklethomas 6 4,909 April-26th-2019, 01:38 PM
Last Post: Armin@netPI
  Modbus TCP Connection via RTE Ethernet Ports Flo_Lo 18 11,699 April-15th-2019, 09:50 PM
Last Post: Armin@netPI
  USB/Ethernet adapter slos 4 3,838 April-8th-2019, 09:11 AM
Last Post: slos
  [SOLVED] Use netX interface as profinet controller jromero248 2 3,204 January-10th-2019, 12:30 PM
Last Post: jromero248
  IP Realtime Ethernet michu252 7 4,943 August-21st-2018, 10:41 AM
Last Post: Armin@netPI

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)